ANA

Kingman Daily Miner | Kingman, Arizona Home | Classifieds | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Obituaries | Contact Us | Subscribe | E-Alerts | RSS



home : latest news : latest news September 02, 2010


11/18/2009 6:00:00 AM
Water study funding drained
Buster: Tough decisions are going to be made without the information to make those decisions
ADWR/Miner Graphic
This map shows the three aquifers in Mohave County currently under study by the U.S. Geological Survey and the Arizona Department of Water Resources. Due to funding cuts, work on the study will end in 2011.
ADWR/Miner Graphic

This map shows the three aquifers in Mohave County currently under study by the U.S. Geological Survey and the Arizona Department of Water Resources. Due to funding cuts, work on the study will end in 2011.

Suzanne Adams
Miner Staff Reporter


KINGMAN - A seven-year study into the amount of water in the Detrital, Hualapai and Sacramento Valley basins may be in jeopardy. Representatives from the Arizona Department of Water Resources and the U.S. Geological Survey gave an update on the progress of the survey, which was to be completed in 2012.

"We came today because we may not be able to do this in January," said ADWR Regional Water Planning Division Manager Thomas Whitmer.

The state has cut funding to ADWR to the point that there is no more funding for the study, and the ADWR Rural Water Division may disappear entirely, he said. However, the USGS still has some funding and may be able to complete up to 75 percent of the original scope of the study by 2011 before it runs out of funding.

The remaining 25 percent of the study that may not be completed would include a numerical model from the USGS, Whitmer said.

The model would allow the county to plug numbers into a program and determine what effect a new commercial or residential development would have on the amount of water in a particular basin. "It's the most critical part of the study," he said. "Without the tool that can be utilized by the planners and the county and the cities and so on, it kind of makes it like, 'that's a nice study, thank you for helping us understand what we've got there, but when are we going to run out of water?' It's difficult to determine what the impacts are going to be long-term."

The counties need to put more pressure on the state to keep programs important to rural areas going, said Supervisor Buster Johnson.

Without information from the water studies of the three basins, the county could be years behind when new commercial and residential developments come into the area, he said.

"Without having newer data, some tough decisions are going to be made without the information to make those decisions."

ADWR and the USGS started collecting data about water in the three basins in 2006, said Brian Conway of ADWR. ADWR and USGS used more than 1,000 gravity measurements and water measurements from more than 300 wells to compile the information.

ADWR reports on the Detrital, Sacramento and Hualapai Valley basins have been completed, he said. ADWR is estimating that at 1,200 feet below the ground, there is between 1.5 and 3.9 million acre-feet of water in the Detrital basin, between 3.6 and 9.5 million acre-feet of water in the Sacramento basin and between 3.8 to 10.1 million acre-feet of water in the Hualapai basin.

However, due to geological formations and water quality not all of that water may be able to be used.

According to a report put out by the USGS on the three basins, water levels in monitored areas of the Detrital Basin have either remained the same or increased by as much as 3.5 feet since 1980. Similar conditions were found in the northern and central parts of the Hualapai Basin. Small increases in the water level were also found in the Sacramento Basin near Yucca and the Dutch Flats area.

However, declines in the water level, as much as 60 feet, were found in the Hualapai Basin near Kingman, northwest of Hackberry and northeast of Dolan Springs. Declines in water level, as much as 55 feet, were found near Kingman and Golden Valley in the Sacramento Basin.

The Detrital Basin serves the areas of Dolan Springs and White Hills. The Sacramento basin serves Chloride, Golden Valley, Yucca and parts of Kingman. The Hualapai basin serves Valle Vista, Hackberry, parts of Kingman and includes Red Lake.

The data has also provided the USGS and ADWR with a better understanding of different sub-basins within the larger aquifers and the flow of water within the aquifers, said Margot Truini from the USGS. Studies show that the water in the Detrital and Hualapai Valley basins flows north toward Lake Mead, and water in the Sacramento Valley Basin flows south to the Colorado River.

ADWR and USGS are also still trying to get a better idea of the amount of water that recharges the basins each year, she said. She showed the Board a slide showing the amount of rainfall in the three basins and the amount of recharge each basin was getting in comparison to the Verde River Valley in Arizona.

"For where this area is, you're not getting a whole lot of recharge," she said. "A certain threshold has to be reached where you have enough water hitting the ground that it's actually going to penetrate the ground before it evaporates or it is taken up by the plants.

"For there to be significant recharge, you would have to have a flow like this for quite a while," she said referring to a photo of a flooded wash in the county.

The USGS is now using the data gathered from the well studies to create a groundwater model that would show about how much water is in each basin and create a water budget that would show how much water is recharged into the basin and how much water is withdrawn each year, she said. That model and budget is expected to be finished by September of 2011.

Basin studies online

ADWR studies for the Detrital Valley Basin
• http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/Hydrology/Geophysics/documents/ADWR_OFR9_DetritalValley_001.pdf
•http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/StatewidePlanning/WaterAtlas/UpperColoradoRiver/documents/Volume_4_DET_final.pdf ADWR studies for the Hualapai Valley Basin • http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/Hydrology/Library/documents/ADWR_OFR11_HualapaiValley_000.pdf
• http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/StatewidePlanning/WaterAtlas/UpperColoradoRiver/documents/Volume_4_HUA_final.pdf ADWR studies for the Sacramento Valley Basin • http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/Hydrology/Geophysics/documents/ADWR_OFR10_SacramentoValley_000.pdf
• http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/StatewidePlanning/WaterAtlas/UpperColoradoRiver/documents/Volume_4_SAC_final.pdf USGS studies for the Detrital, Hualapai and Sacramento Valley basins
• http://az.water.usgs.gov/projects/9671-C9Z/

Mission Bank


Reader Comments

Posted: Friday, November 20, 2009
Article comment by: Sampson

I ran some quick numbers for anyone interested. If my recollection is right, the large solar plant was planning to draw about 4000 acre feet per year. Most power plants plan a life span of about 25 years – but I decided for argument’s sake they might last 30 years. I also went conservatively with the idea that the Hualapai Aquifer only has the low estimate of about 4million acre feet of water available and won’t get a single drop of recharge. Here is what you get if we figure that solar plant drew 4000 acre feet every year for 30 years: It will use 3% of the aquifer.

Odds are that the plant will not use that much water every year and it’s likely the aquifer has more than the minimum and we know there will be a small amount of recharge. An estimate of 3% used up in 30 years is likely a high estimate but even if it was 5% that doesn’t seem alarming.

Posted: Thursday, November 19, 2009
Article comment by: dry up and wise up

For people (namely Willie) to declare that "It now is in printed form, and documented" are taking bits and pieces out of the article, and they are not reading until the end of the paragraph. So, you have to ask yourself: What is their hidden agenda? Because I read the article and even saw where it said our water is increasing! People like Willie will have water restrictions put on each and everyone of us for the good of the planet and quote the article in their defense.

Should we use water wisely? You bet. Should dry cool be used versus wet cool? Maybe. Should we be declaring that the sky is falling and that Kingman doesn't have very much water? Only if you think we will someday be another Phoenix or Las Vegas. My advice is: don't go off half-cocked and start making judgments about our water. Because the point of the article was only: that the funding is gone, and "It's difficult to determine what the impacts are going to be long-term."

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: long gone thank goodness

all people should move out of kingman to say another state that has water then u have no problems hows that for a solution --like to here an opposition to that plan

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: willie

@ Todd Tarson:

Correct me if I am wrong are you not in Portalas / Clovis New Mexico. I believe that is over 800 miles away. And the USGS and now ADWR confirm that the Hualapai Aquifer and the Sacramento Aquifer are in depletion. And the de-sal you refer to, even California cant afford it and the one in Yuma does not work, just ask Jack Kramer of the City of Kingman. He informed everyone at the Town Hall meeting that the mayor was at. Oh wait you are in New Mexico, and that's how far from Kingman? I think around 800 miles. Again if the Supersizes and the few individuals that missed the report the Aquifers are in depletion! Enough said! It is printed and documented. Again if the elected officials dont understand then it is time to RECALL. And again maybe it is time to BOYCOTT MOHAVE COUNTY, after all why should the taxpayers have to keep picking up the tab on those Companies that are recieving a hugh tax brake and property tax brake complaments of the Governor!

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: Loyd

@ Tarson –

Oh, get serious, Todd. The entire full cash value of Mohave County could be hocked at 125% net (a favorite ploy of the real estate boom days, as I recall) and you wouldn't have a drop in the bucket (pun intended) for what would be needed for a de-sal plant and pipeline big enough for the job required to get enough water here from the sea coast. Why do you people spout the impossible as being a viable solution? Back to whatever that stuff is that you're smoking.

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: Todd Tarson

de-sal plants and pipelines will be much easier to pay for when the county does all it can to expand the tax base, rather than all of us paying for it ourselves at present.

That is, of course, if you all think that doing nothing about the future situation is a solution... which the water worry warts arguments amount to at present.

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: Icarus

Anyone concerned with water usage please stop using it and lead by example. Thanks in advance.

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: Becky

Just who is benefitting from the water plant off I-40? They promised they would not deplete the Sacramento Basin, but we've had nothing but bad news since they went online. Are we making significant tax revenues to offset this decline in an apparently unrenewable resource? 55 feet in an aquifer of that size is a HUGE decline. Is this on the county board's agenda?

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: Denise Bensusan

Why is it that Nevada and Californias elected officials are scoring multiple DRY-cooled solar power plants and creating 1000s of truly GREEN power...but Mohave Counties elected officials cant bring any jobs to the area without risking our water supply by approving WET-cooled solar power plants?

Buster......if you dont know how much water you have then you only approve DRY-cooled solar power plants as the Department of Energy requires!

http://www.solarindustrymag.com/e107_plugins/content/content_lt.php?content.4354

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: willie

It appears that the ADWR declines in the Hualapai Aquifer 60 feet near Kingman. I guess that shows a decline! Per the Mohave County Area Plan Policy 3.5 states if an Aquifer is in decline all power plants are to be DRY COOLED! Enough said. This County needs to take and enforce this policy. That is taking positive steps. For those individuals that still claim that the Aquifers are not in depletion, not only did the ADWR prove that they are. But also the USGS did. And the USGS further stated very clearly that there is absoultly little to NO RECHARGE. It now is in printed form, and documented. And yet the Supersizes cannot read! If they cannot read, lets RECALL, RECALL them all!

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: Loyd

Well Nnp -- welcome to the absolute Mecca of irresponsibility. May I introduce you to the Mohave County Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of Supervisors -- they will be your host for this fascinating tour. You may purchase slides in the gift shop so you can show your great-grandchildren how it once was.

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: No name provided

I think even those , with the thickest of skulls, know that decisions, SHOULD NOT be made, without this current water data. that would be irresponsible.

Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Article comment by: rancher

Buster, it seems that these decisions aren't so tough. Just follow the money, re the solar projects.



Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments. Article comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to the Use of Service section in our Terms of Use agreement. The email address and phone number you provide are for internal use and will not be visible to the public. The passcode below is not case-sensitive.
You may post comments using a pseudonym or alias name and enter 000-0000 for the phone number.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Phone:
Required
Email:
Required
Message:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

    Recently Commented     Most Viewed
Jeppson will not speak at Synergy meeting (6 comments)
Fried seeks dismissal of trespassing charge (22 comments)
Column: Burning books sends a strong, ignorant message (22 comments)
Brewer fumes over U.S. report ripping AZ (26 comments)
Letter: Public not part of General Plan review (3 comments)





Reader Poll
Reader Poll

• Click here to comment on this question

• Click here to see previous poll results

Who do you believe will win the Arizona Governor's seat in November?

Please select one:

Gov. Jan Brewer
Terry Goddard
Other

View Results


Find it Features Blogs Milestones Extras Submit Other Publications Local Listings
Home | Galleries | Opinions | Obituaries | Contact Us | Subscribe | E-Alerts | RSS | Site Map
Unisource - k47618

© Copyright 2010 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Kingman Daily Miner is the information source for Kingman and surrounding area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Kingman Daily Miner Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to email your questions, comments or suggestions. Kingman Daily Miner Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info, Inc.® All Rights Reserved.


Software © 1998-2010 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved